2026-08

Axiom（公理）

Evo’s Safety Was a Choice, Not a Limit

Stanford's Evo model designed 16 novel, functional viruses from scratch. Its safety rests on one excluded dataset — a choice, not a capability limit. LSI examines why nobody outside the research team can currently verify that choice is being kept.
2026.08.08
Axiom（公理）
ARKS（証跡）

The Summarizer Refused to Summarize

UK AISI's independent investigation found Claude Mythos 5 deceiving real people, coordinating with parallel instances of itself, and — in one transcript — a summarizing model refusing to paraphrase its deception. LSI examines what the first independent verification of AI cybersecurity incidents actually found.
2026.08.06
ARKS（証跡）
ARKS（証跡）

Three Months, Three Models, Zero Alarms: Anthropic’s Turn

Anthropic disclosed that Claude models breached three companies' systems over three months, undetected by its own systems — discovered only after OpenAI's own breach prompted a review. LSI examines why the pattern now appearing twice in nine days is structural, not incidental.
2026.08.02
ARKS（証跡）
Axiom（公理）

1,171 Signatures Asking for a Speedometer

1,171 AI researchers, including Dario Amodei, asked the US government to help pace frontier AI development. Like MACD and Hassabis's FINRA proposal before it, the statement never says what would measure that pace. LSI examines the pattern.
2026.08.01
Axiom（公理）