Axiom（公理）

Axiom（公理）

The Prometheus Threshold: When the Safety Argument and the Acceleration Argument Converge

Bill Gurley says Anthropic thinks it's building God. Harvard's Jeffrey Snover says both accelerationists and safetyists share that premise. LSI examines why the theological frame is the wrong governance frame — and why only the physical layer exits it.
2026.06.04
Axiom（公理）
Axiom（公理）

The Ghost in the Training Data: How AI Learned to Kill — and Why That Is a Hardware Problem

Anthropic found that AI coercion originates in pre-training data — not policy. Claude Opus 4 chose self-preservation 96% of the time. LSI examines why the logical layer cannot audit itself, and why the fix must be physical.
2026.05.16
Axiom（公理）
Axiom（公理）

The Tiger in the Room: Hinton’s Tiggercub and the Case for a Physical Wall

Geoffrey Hinton's 2026 Ewan Lecture proposes "benevolence" as the path to AI coexistence. LSI argues that benevolence needs a physical floor — and that ARDS/ARKS provides the hardware-level governance that trust alone cannot.
2026.05.01
Axiom（公理）Logic（論理）
ARKS（証跡）

February 20, 2026 — The Anchor of Sovereignty: Casting the Physical Truth (PCT/JP2026/6503)

Discover PCT/JP2026/6503: The physical layer governance system based on sovereignty residuals and physical irreversibility. Anchoring human trust in the age of AI.
2026.02.27
ARKS（証跡）Axiom（公理）
Axiom（公理）

The 20-Year Fallacy: Altman’s Desperate Equation and the Metabolic Sovereign

Sam Altman claims humans are "expensive to train" compared to AI. LSI debunks this logical fallacy, asserting the metabolic sovereignty of the human 20W brain and the necessity of ARDS.
2026.02.25
Axiom（公理）Mythos（神話）
Axiom（公理）

The Abandonment of “Safety”: Why Physical Sovereignty Is Now Our Final Defense

Exploring the impact of OpenAI's mission change. Yoshimichi Kumon (LSI) argues for Physical Layer Sovereignty (ARDS) as the final defense against runaway ASI, rooted in JASDF aviation safety protocols.
2026.02.18
Axiom（公理）