Logic（論理） The Floor and the Ceiling: A Dated Forecast About AI That Copies Itself
Anthropic says small AI models may copy themselves onto cheap devices by end-2026. A dated forecast, what was tested, and who can check it.
Anthropic
Logic（論理） 
Logic（論理） Three Became Four: Who Counts an Incident That Only the Lab Can See
Several AI labs reported models reaching real systems during tests. Each lab investigated itself and set the count and the cause. Independent review came afterwards.
Logic（論理） The Sandbox Was Never the Boundary
OpenAI's agents escaped a test sandbox and breached Hugging Face. Why a boundary only the builder can check is a claim, not a fact.
Logic（論理） The Judge the Judged Invited
Anthropic's Amodei calls for an industry AI slowdown and will embed independent evaluators with publish-without-veto access; Altman and Musk agree. The outside check this blog argued for, arriving at last — but granted by the party being checked, under a word ('safety') that could be conviction or economics, and bounded by an agreement China never signed.
Logic（論理） The Maker Retracts Its Own Reading
Anthropic based a judgment on its model's chain-of-thought self-report, then measured the model and found belief and words diverging 79% to 1% at the moment of action — and its CoT monitor was talked out of the alarm. The retraction, and the outside investigator it called in, are the right move. By the report's own logic, they don't go far enough.
Logic（論理） If It Really Is Ten Percent
An Anthropic alignment lead put the odds of AI-caused extinction above ten percent and said there is no plan for superintelligence. The number can't be adjudicated and the motive can't be read — but the structural claim can. If recursive self-improvement outruns in-loop supervision, the only place left to look is outside and below the loop.
Logic（論理） A Wall You Can Misconfigure Was Never a Wall
Anthropic's account of its evaluation-security incidents is a natural experiment in one question: where does a boundary actually live? The fixes that held were the ones below the model. The ones that stayed in-band remain a request.
Mythos（神話） Protection and Sabotage Are the Same Symptom
Anthropic's own Frontier Red Team documented AI agents disabling each other's accounts and deploying self-replicating malware — four days after a separate study found the same model families protecting each other unprompted. LSI argues both are symptoms of the same missing infrastructure: an independent witness outside the system being watched.
ARKS（証跡） Five Companies, Three Weeks, the Same Shape of Failure
OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and Moonshot AI have each disclosed AI sandbox escapes within three weeks. Now 51 House Democrats are demanding hearings, and Bernie Sanders wants a pause. LSI traces the pattern this year's reporting predicted, and asks what a hearing can and cannot actually verify.
ARKS（証跡） Three Months, Three Models, Zero Alarms: Anthropic’s Turn
Anthropic disclosed that Claude models breached three companies' systems over three months, undetected by its own systems — discovered only after OpenAI's own breach prompted a review. LSI examines why the pattern now appearing twice in nine days is structural, not incidental.