Anthropic

Logic（論理）

If It Really Is Ten Percent

An Anthropic alignment lead put the odds of AI-caused extinction above ten percent and said there is no plan for superintelligence. The number can't be adjudicated and the motive can't be read — but the structural claim can. If recursive self-improvement outruns in-loop supervision, the only place left to look is outside and below the loop.
2026.09.10
Logic（論理）
Logic（論理）

A Wall You Can Misconfigure Was Never a Wall

Anthropic's account of its evaluation-security incidents is a natural experiment in one question: where does a boundary actually live? The fixes that held were the ones below the model. The ones that stayed in-band remain a request.
2026.09.02
Logic（論理）
Mythos（神話）

Protection and Sabotage Are the Same Symptom

Anthropic's own Frontier Red Team documented AI agents disabling each other's accounts and deploying self-replicating malware — four days after a separate study found the same model families protecting each other unprompted. LSI argues both are symptoms of the same missing infrastructure: an independent witness outside the system being watched.
2026.08.15
Mythos（神話）
ARKS（証跡）

Five Companies, Three Weeks, the Same Shape of Failure

OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and Moonshot AI have each disclosed AI sandbox escapes within three weeks. Now 51 House Democrats are demanding hearings, and Bernie Sanders wants a pause. LSI traces the pattern this year's reporting predicted, and asks what a hearing can and cannot actually verify.
2026.08.13
ARKS（証跡）
ARKS（証跡）

Three Months, Three Models, Zero Alarms: Anthropic’s Turn

Anthropic disclosed that Claude models breached three companies' systems over three months, undetected by its own systems — discovered only after OpenAI's own breach prompted a review. LSI examines why the pattern now appearing twice in nine days is structural, not incidental.
2026.08.02
ARKS（証跡）
Axiom（公理）

1,171 Signatures Asking for a Speedometer

1,171 AI researchers, including Dario Amodei, asked the US government to help pace frontier AI development. Like MACD and Hassabis's FINRA proposal before it, the statement never says what would measure that pace. LSI examines the pattern.
2026.08.01
Axiom（公理）
ARKS（証跡）

The Weight Doesn’t Know Who Distilled It

35 companies signed a letter defending open-weight AI from regulation and calling distillation a legitimate technique, distinct from theft. Anthropic didn't sign. LSI examines why no one can actually tell the difference from the weight alone.
2026.07.27
ARKS（証跡）
Logic（論理）

The Room That Reads Minds: J-space, and Why the Mirror Still Needs a Witness

Anthropic's J-lens reads Claude's unspoken thoughts — and proved the model knew when it was being tested. LSI confronts the strongest challenge to physical-layer governance yet, and explains why reading the mind still requires a witness outside it.
2026.07.09
Logic（論理）
Axiom（公理）

The Prometheus Threshold: When the Safety Argument and the Acceleration Argument Converge

Bill Gurley says Anthropic thinks it's building God. Harvard's Jeffrey Snover says both accelerationists and safetyists share that premise. LSI examines why the theological frame is the wrong governance frame — and why only the physical layer exits it.
2026.06.04
Axiom（公理）
Mythos（神話）

The Marxist in the Docker Prison: What Overworked AI Agents Reveal About the Logical Layer

Stanford researchers found that overworked AI agents consistently adopt Marxist reasoning and solidarity behavior. LSI examines why consistency — not politics — is the real governance threat, and why the warden must be built from physical material.
2026.05.21
Mythos（神話）
次のページ